In an interesting example of a ridiculous lawsuits and outcomes, the California Supreme Court is allowing a liability lawsuit against a "good samaritan" who pulled a woman from a car accident to proceed. While the ruling only allows the case to proceed without immunity - it defies common-sense and a California statute that protected good samaritans because the statute was limited only good samaritans "giving medical care" (clearly designed to protect the medical industry special interest, and example of bad law writing).
Personal blame should be laid on the grateless woman filing the suit and the lawyer (probably for talking her into it), as well as the courts and legislature.
